🔗 Share this article

These times exhibit a quite unique situation: the first-ever US march of the caretakers. They vary in their skills and characteristics, but they all share the same objective – to prevent an Israeli violation, or even devastation, of Gaza’s delicate ceasefire. Since the war ended, there have been few occasions without at least one of the former president's envoys on the ground. Just in the last few days featured the arrival of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all appearing to execute their duties.

Israel occupies their time. In only a few short period it initiated a set of operations in the region after the killings of two Israeli military personnel – resulting, according to reports, in dozens of Palestinian injuries. Several ministers urged a resumption of the fighting, and the Israeli parliament enacted a initial measure to annex the West Bank. The American reaction was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in various respects, the US leadership appears more focused on maintaining the current, uneasy stage of the peace than on progressing to the following: the reconstruction of Gaza. When it comes to that, it seems the US may have ambitions but few concrete plans.

Currently, it remains unclear when the planned multinational governing body will actually assume control, and the identical applies to the designated security force – or even the identity of its personnel. On a recent day, Vance declared the US would not impose the membership of the international contingent on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s government persists to refuse multiple options – as it did with the Turkish offer recently – what follows? There is also the opposite issue: which party will decide whether the forces favoured by the Israelis are even prepared in the task?

The matter of how long it will require to neutralize Hamas is similarly unclear. “The aim in the administration is that the multinational troops is will at this point take charge in disarming Hamas,” said the official lately. “It’s going to take a while.” The former president only emphasized the uncertainty, stating in an conversation a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unidentified members of this yet-to-be-formed global force could enter the territory while Hamas fighters still remain in control. Are they dealing with a governing body or a militant faction? These are just a few of the questions surfacing. Others might wonder what the verdict will be for everyday civilians in the present situation, with Hamas carrying on to attack its own political rivals and critics.

Latest incidents have afresh underscored the blind spots of local journalism on the two sides of the Gazan boundary. Every source seeks to examine all conceivable aspect of Hamas’s infractions of the truce. And, usually, the situation that Hamas has been delaying the repatriation of the bodies of slain Israeli captives has dominated the news.

Conversely, attention of civilian casualties in Gaza stemming from Israeli strikes has obtained minimal focus – if at all. Consider the Israeli retaliatory actions in the wake of Sunday’s Rafah incident, in which a pair of troops were lost. While Gaza’s authorities stated dozens of fatalities, Israeli news analysts criticised the “limited answer,” which focused on only installations.

That is not new. Over the recent weekend, Gaza’s press agency accused Israeli forces of breaking the peace with the group multiple occasions after the truce came into effect, causing the death of 38 individuals and wounding another 143. The allegation was insignificant to most Israeli reporting – it was simply missing. This applied to accounts that eleven individuals of a Palestinian family were killed by Israeli forces recently.

Gaza’s rescue organization reported the group had been attempting to return to their dwelling in the a Gaza City area of Gaza City when the transport they were in was targeted for allegedly crossing the “demarcation line” that defines zones under Israeli army control. This boundary is not visible to the human eye and is visible solely on plans and in authoritative papers – often not available to ordinary people in the region.

Even that occurrence hardly rated a note in Israeli news outlets. A major outlet covered it in passing on its online platform, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who stated that after a questionable vehicle was identified, forces discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the transport persisted to move toward the forces in a way that created an direct threat to them. The forces shot to neutralize the threat, in line with the truce.” No casualties were stated.

Given such framing, it is understandable numerous Israeli citizens think Hamas alone is to blame for breaking the peace. That belief could lead to prompting calls for a stronger stance in Gaza.

Eventually – maybe sooner than expected – it will not be adequate for US envoys to play supervisors, instructing the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need